He hated women & kept womens organs in jars!!! The killings stopped after he left for the US! Sounds like our man to me Regards Lindsay I believe it to be Michael Ostrog.xxįrom all the past enquiries I have to go for Dr Francis Tumblety, serial killers have shown they nearly always show homosexual tendancies so he fits the bill on that point, plus he had some medical knowledge, he lived within a mile of most of the murder locations, the case was massive in the US with huge press coverage given to him, (blocked in the UK) Scotland Yard sent 2 detectives to New york to catch him & failed. I think, looking at the evidence, Tumblety is the most convincing- though I have to disagree with Lindsay Room saying that serial killers nearly always show homosexual tendancies- from what Ive read, I would have to disagree, and actually the fact he may have been homosexual is the one point made against his being the killer as gay serial killers apparently usually target men. The British way, talk a load of crap and miss the obvious.

never before has a man so middle class have a chip so big on his shoulder. But hey why let the truth get in the way of a stupid programme.Citizen Elms as always going for the Royals. James Maybrick, most that have studied the issue all have the same suspect.In some ways I feel the the media prefer to get it wrong, that way they can spin a story.But that's the BBC for you talking rubbish and feeding misinformation to all. It was not some 'visitor' like Maybrick, Tumblety, Druitt, or Duke of Clarence and Avendale.

Like most of the serious Ripper historians I believe Jack was an unknown person living in the heart of the area (Kaminsky is a strong possibilty as is Barnett). He is in my family tree along with the other Maybricks. He was left out here but was a killer in America who fled here then fled back in late 1888 Having read Patricia Cornwell's book and been on the Jack the Ripper London Walk twice I believe Jack the Ripper was Walter Sickert.

The Ripper Secret by Jack Steel